The Malaysian Fisheries Journal (MFJ) is a publication fully owned by the Fisheries Research Institute (FRI), Department of Fisheries Malaysia. The journal serves as a platform for fisheries researchers and the Department of Fisheries staff to publish and share their research findings. It is also open to researchers and students from universities and agencies with backgrounds in fisheries and aquaculture.
MFJ is committed to publishing novel, high-quality, peer-reviewed articles covering all areas of fisheries science. While we have a special focus on research related to the Malaysian environment, submissions addressing broader regional and global issues are equally encouraged. Our comprehensive and systematic coverage helps readers stay informed on the latest advancements in fisheries science, including topics such as fisheries resources, climate change, aquaculture, biosecurity, genetics, food safety and security, aquaculture diseases, and the conservation of marine and freshwater endangered species, across both fundamental and applied research.
The journal aims to provide a forum for the dissemination of research across all aspects of fisheries science. We particularly welcome manuscripts that address issues relevant to local communities and contribute to the advancement of sustainable fisheries.
When submitting a manuscript to the MFJ, authors must ensure that the submission is original and has not been published or submitted elsewhere. If any part of the work has been previously published, it must be properly cited and clearly identified. This requirement applies to both the authors’ own work and that of others.
MFJ does not permit redundant, duplicate, or concurrent submissions. Authors must not submit the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously, nor publish manuscripts that substantially overlap with work already published elsewhere. Submitting the same content to more than one journal at the same time is considered unethical and will not be tolerated.
Manuscripts submitted to MFJ must not have been previously submitted, uploaded, or published—in whole or in part—in any form (including book chapters, conference proceedings, or online platforms such as preprint servers) or in any language. The journal places high importance on originality and novelty as key criteria for acceptance.
Authors are prohibited from dividing a single study into multiple parts for separate submission with the aim of increasing publication count. Likewise, submitting related or overlapping content to other platforms or publications while a manuscript is under review with MFJ is not allowed, unless it involves a resubmission following a rejection from another journal.
Before submitting to MFJ, authors must ensure that any other version of the manuscript is formally withdrawn from other journals or online platforms. Manuscripts that remain publicly accessible online, in whole or in part, will not be considered. If the submitted manuscript includes material that overlaps with previous publications, authors must cite the prior work and notify the MFJ editor, providing a copy if requested.
Self-citations must be appropriate and not excessive. Authors must cite their previous work even when not quoting directly. Attempts to artificially inflate citation metrics through excessive self-citation are discouraged. Additionally, authors must avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest, whether personal, financial, institutional, or political. Any potential conflicts must be declared and MFJ reserves the right to request further information.
Authorship should reflect significant contributions to the research. Co-authors should only include those who made meaningful scientific contributions. Individuals who played only administrative roles or provided non-academic support (e.g., equipment loans) should not be listed as co-authors. All authors share responsibility for the integrity of the work.
The corresponding author must ensure that all co-authors are listed appropriately, have agreed on the authorship order, and are aware of the manuscript submission. Changes to authorship—including adding, removing, or reordering names—are not permitted after submission. The corresponding author is responsible for managing all communication with MFJ.
For accepted manuscripts, MFJ retains the copyright for all published content.
For manuscripts involving research on live animals, authors must confirm adherence to relevant ethical guidelines and obtain appropriate ethical approvals.
To uphold academic integrity, authors are strongly encouraged to check their manuscripts for plagiarism using plagiarism-detection software before submission.
All content submitted to the MFJ must be free from plagiarism, falsification, fabrication, or the omission of significant material. Plagiarism can take many forms—from directly presenting someone else’s work as one’s own, to copying or closely paraphrasing substantial portions of another’s work without appropriate attribution, or falsely claiming credit for research conducted by others.
Plagiarism involves using another person’s published or unpublished ideas, words, or other intellectual property without proper acknowledgment or permission, and representing them as original. This includes material taken from abstracts, unpublished manuscripts, or any content in either print or electronic formats. The effect of such misconduct is to mislead readers regarding the true contributions of the authors.
Authors are expected to cite the work of others explicitly and accurately, even when ideas are not quoted directly. This standard applies regardless of whether the referenced material is published, unpublished, or available online.
Plagiarism, along with falsification and fabrication, constitutes scientific misconduct and is a serious violation of MFJ’s publication ethics. Any manuscript found to contain such unethical practices will be handled promptly and in accordance with MFJ’s code of ethics. Confidentiality and due process will be upheld in all investigations related to suspected misconduct.
In cases of major ethical violations, the manuscript will be immediately rejected. All authors involved may be barred from submitting to MFJ for a period ranging from one to three years, depending on the severity of the misconduct. The MFJ Editor reserves the right to evaluate and decide on issues such as plagiarism and redundancy on a case-by-case basis.
To maintain editorial integrity, if an editor member is an author on a manuscript under review, they must recuse themselves from any part of the editorial or decision-making process. The MFJ Editorial member holds full authority and responsibility for determining appropriate sanctions, which may be applied individually to authors based on the extent of their involvement.
Peer review is a critical process in scholarly publishing, serving as an essential mechanism for evaluating research work and ensuring the dissemination of high-quality science. Reviewers are selected by the MFJ Editor for their expertise and are tasked with providing professional, objective assessments of submitted manuscripts. Their evaluations help improve the clarity, accuracy, and scientific integrity of the work, while identifying research that is novel, significant, and appropriate for publication in MFJ.
Each manuscript submitted to MFJ is typically evaluated by two (2) independent Reviewers. While authors are encouraged to suggest two or three potential Reviewers during the submission process, the final decision rests solely with the Editor. The Editor is not obligated to use suggested Reviewers and may choose to disregard these recommendations. Authors may also request the exclusion of certain individuals from the review process; however, such requests are considered at the Editor’s discretion and must be based on valid ethical or conflict-of-interest concerns.
Editors are responsible for routinely assessing the quality and appropriateness of peer reviews. They may edit Reviewer comments to remove identifying information or to ensure that feedback remains constructive and professional. If a review lacks quality or is deemed inappropriate, the Editor may choose not to forward it to the Author. Even after a manuscript is accepted, Editors reserve the right to make editorial changes to enhance clarity, remove ambiguity, or ensure consistency in presentation.
Authors must respect the confidentiality and integrity of the peer review process. They should not nominate Reviewers with whom they have personal, professional, or collaborative relationships, such as friends, colleagues, or recent co-authors. Direct communication between Authors and Reviewers regarding a manuscript under review is strictly prohibited and constitutes a breach of ethical standards. Attempting to manipulate the review process by suggesting biased Reviewers is unethical and unacceptable.
If a Reviewer recognizes the identity of an Author and believes a conflict of interest may exist, they should immediately decline to review the manuscript to avoid the appearance of bias or favouritism. Peer review must be conducted impartially and objectively, with a commitment to confidentiality. Reviewers must not reveal, share, or discuss the contents of the manuscript with third parties.
MFJ expects its Reviewers to meet minimum standards in terms of their qualifications, including experience in original research, prior publication, and a demonstrated ability to critically appraise scientific work. Reviewers should be subject matter experts and selected for their objectivity and technical competence. They are expected to provide written, unbiased, and constructive comments within the designated timeframe, typically within two weeks for an initial review. If a Reviewer is unable to meet the deadline, they must inform the Editor promptly to either request an extension or recommend an alternate Reviewer.
The MFJ manuscript template serves as a standardized format to streamline the manuscript preparation and copyediting process. Developed according to MFJ’s house style, the template provides detailed formatting guidelines to help authors structure their papers clearly and consistently. It is provided in a standard Microsoft Word format to facilitate ease of use.
When preparing a manuscript, authors are required to follow MFJ’s formatting requirements to ensure consistency in presentation. To support this, a downloadable Word template is made available, similar to those used by other established academic journals. Proper formatting is a crucial part of scholarly publishing, as each journal has its own style and layout guidelines. Using the MFJ template ensures that submissions align with the journal’s expected appearance, both online and in print.
Regular Article
Regular articles should present full-length, original empirical research with clearly defined sections, including Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion, and Conclusion. The research must offer new, significant findings supported by proper references and detailed explanations. The conclusion should be concise, clearly highlighting the research output—avoid using point form.
Manuscripts should not exceed 6,000 words, inclusive of tables, figures, and references. A maximum of 10 figures and tables combined is allowed. However, after peer review, the word limit may be extended up to 8,000 words to adequately address reviewers’ and editors’ comments. Additional figures or tables, if necessary, should be included as supplementary material. Submissions may be returned to authors if they exceed figure limits or if image resolution is insufficient for publication quality.
Short Communication
Short communications are concise reports that present significant new information of interest to the MFJ readership. These submissions must not exceed 3,000 words, including tables, figures, and references. Short communications are intended for rapid dissemination of complete findings and are not suitable for reporting preliminary results or abridged versions of regular articles.
Review Article
Review articles should offer a critical evaluation of existing research by organizing, integrating, and interpreting published material. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews are encouraged. These articles should provide a comprehensive overview and scholarly interpretation of a specific topic within the field of fisheries and aquaculture.
Review articles should not exceed 12,000 words (excluding references), and should include no more than 20 figures and tables in total. Any additional visual content must be submitted as supplementary material. Authors are reminded not to duplicate data between figures and tables. Submissions will be returned for revision if figure quality is poor or if the maximum allowed number of visuals is exceeded.
Please ensure that your manuscript is written in clear and proper British/American English. A combination of both, will not be accepted.
There are no APCs for this journal. Accepted articles are published free of charge. MFJ covers the costs associated with peer review administration, professional production of articles in PDF and other formats, and the dissemination of published papers across various platforms. Additionally, there are no charges for rejected articles, no submission fees, and no surcharges based on article length, figures, or supplementary data.
Authors may submit manuscripts directly to : editormfj@dof.gov.my
Editor-in-Chief
Malaysia Fisheries Journal
Fisheries Research Institute (FRI) Batu Maung
11960 Batu Maung, Penang, Malaysia
For any inquiries, please email to: editormfj@dof.gov.my
Current Issues:
https://fri.dof.gov.my/penerbitan-malaysia-fisheries-journal-mfj/